Part One
The Plot Against America by Philip Roth was a very interesting book to read. First started reading it, I didn’t look to the back to see that it was a “narrative invention,” and was somewhat made up experiences. So I was so shocked and surprised at some of the points. This book did serve as a paradoxical novel away from American “consensus” thoughts. One example that specifically stuck out was the idea of a Republican who is President Lindberg going to cities all across the US and giving speeches to win votes. This sticks out as against consensus of something a republican would do specifically the part in the novel where Lindberg is supposed to go to Chicago to give his first speech but never ends up. That is the prime working class city that most Republican would know they would lose to a Democratic candidate. Another issue that was prevalent in the reading of this novel was the idea of containment. Based on the reading of A Very Short Introduction: The Cold War, which is actual fact/myth/consensus America was not a country to back down in a fight or to help prevent the spread of oppositions to democracy. In this novel Lindberg was clearly elected due to his ideas of keeping America out of war at all costs. Befriending Hitler, which as discussed in class along with Mussolini, and Stalin were all given evil connotations in an American students head, either from high school teachers, media or parents. In addition something that jumped out as surprising was the fact that Hitler was invited to the White House along with his girlfriend of all days on Fourth of July for celebrations.
The historicity of the novel served to make the novel seem real and able to happen at some points in time. If the novel was too far-fetched then people would stop reading and think the ideas are too absurd. Roth played on this in several steps especially with the idea of Lindberg being the puppet for Hitler due to the fact of his child was in their hands. The fact that Lindberg would not be able to see his child if he didn’t do what Himmler wanted. This scene also lends to the idea of perpetual fear. This everlasting fear of if not doing as told what would the outcome be or the consequences to ones actions. The historicity gives the novel time consciousness with chapter 8 given as newsreels, while the disruptive parts brings the times and events to reality and shocking.
Another example of this perpetual fear is seen with Aunt Evelyn. When Philip goes to visit her office Aunt Evelyn is amused by showing Philip all the materialistic things she is able to get from Rabbi Benglsdorf, such as the bracelet, her broach, and ring. In the end of the novel when Aunt Evelyn runs to Bess for protection, she is turned away because Bess tells her go to her mansion for protection we can’t do anything for you. It shows that these materialistic things cannot help with feeling of fear that are inside, it cannot shield you from fear. These are tangible things unlike the insurance policies that Herman sells which are intangible and would help with the fear of dying and what would be left of your children.
Part Two
Several lessons about paradoxical writing can be taken. For one the quote I like the best from this novel is “History is everything that happens everywhere…” In writing this novel generalized statements about events or feelings were not made. Everything was detailed oriented, for example with the part with Route 22 highway and the pipelines. Also the disruptiveness made the novel more interesting and had to pay more attention. At several points including the one with Seldon’s father’s death and when Bess went to take Aunt Evelyn home and Philip was imagining his father married to Seldon’s mother. These parts I had to reread because I thought I missed a sentence to link the two ideas together. Also the novel started off as a novel then was disrupted and written as a newsreel in Chapter 8, which made the reading very interesting. It took the novel outside to the big picture for a little while and then brought it back in for closing in Chapter 9.